Selected work

Technology change, delivered.

A closer look at the decisions, implementation, and operating results behind our work.

Complex work. Clear evidence.

These anonymized engagements show where we became involved, what we changed, and the documented results. Client and application identities remain confidential.

Enterprise modernization

Industrial enterprise

Enterprise systems modernization & integration

An operational replacement for a legacy integration supporting essential field-service workflows.

Reconstructing operating behavior, resolving undocumented business rules, and implementing a replacement that supported essential field-service workflows.

9 of 9production processes recorded operational at closeout

Inside the delivered integration

Explore the engagement

01 / 04

Business risk

Essential field-service workflows depended on a legacy integration that needed an operational replacement.

Critical finding

Actual operating behavior included undocumented business rules, processing issues, and dependencies that had to be reconstructed.

Our role

Owned architecture and hands-on implementation across enterprise applications and an external operations platform. Reconstructed actual operating behavior, resolved undocumented business rules and processing issues, addressed dependencies, and implemented secure access and operating documentation.

Documented outcome

Delivered an operational replacement supporting the required field-service workflows, with all nine production processes operational. The implementation runbook recorded 38% faster response times, 74% fewer errors, 40% lower resource usage, and 50% fewer maintenance hours.

Project-specific closeout figures recorded in the implementation runbook; not independently audited long-run KPIs.

Explore with the AI guide

Product engineering

Contact-center migration application

A completed application that turns configuration into assessment and migration plans, supported by controlled validation and a successful customer migration.

From assessment to delivery. Structured findings, reviewable plans, and explicit approval boundaries connect the application to the engineering work.

Inside the migration application

Explore the engagement

01 / 04

Business risk

Contact-center migration required a structured understanding of source configuration before changes could be approved.

Critical finding

Assessment, review, and execution needed distinct boundaries, supported by testable integration and data-handling controls.

Our role

Delivered application development, configuration review, integration, validation, and remediation. Separated assessment jobs, reports, and operational records; built explicit execution approval and data-handling controls into the workflow.

Documented outcome

Completed the application and supported a successful customer migration. Engineering validation covered hosted assessment outputs, a scoped source read, a separate lab creation and readback, authenticated access, and synthetic storage and cleanup behavior.

Provider, application, client, and environment are de-identified. The case describes this delivery and its validation.

Explore with the AI guide

M&A integration

Post-acquisition identity & endpoint integration

A gated, wave-based migration bringing acquired users and devices into the enterprise environment.

Business access preserved. Rollback and re-cutover were validated before wider migration.

100%login, profile and resource-access validation

~94%core application validation

Reported results for the first larger site wave. Remaining user-specific issues were tracked through hypercare.

Explore the cutover decision

Explore the engagement

01 / 04

Business risk

An acquisition required users and devices to move into the enterprise environment while preserving the access and workflows the business depended on.

Critical finding

A device-identity blocker had to be resolved, with rollback and re-cutover validated before the wider migration could proceed.

Our role

Led a gated, wave-based approach spanning identity and device mapping, access reconciliation, endpoint readiness, testing, and cutover governance. Resolved a device-identity blocker, validated rollback and re-cutover, and coordinated business-use validation and hypercare.

Documented outcome

The first larger site migration completed ahead of schedule for available users. Reported post-cutover validation for that wave showed 100% successful login, profile loading, and access to files, mapped drives, printers, and internal resources. Core business-application checks were approximately 94% successful, with remaining issues tracked through hypercare. The work established a repeatable approach for subsequent waves.

Results describe the documented first larger site wave.

Explore with the AI guide

Integration & automation

Enterprise order integration & automation

A tested cross-system order integration with transaction controls and corrected technical documentation.

134 / 150hours delivered / authorized cap

7 ordersfollow-up regression suite

Two formal end-to-end scenarios confirmed enterprise order creation. Duplicate prevention, error handling, reprocessing and documentation were included.

Completed implementation and validation evidence, not a claim about sustained production volume.

Explore transaction reliability

Explore the engagement

01 / 04

Business risk

Customer-order activity needed to reach the enterprise system reliably across differing data models and processing behavior.

Critical finding

Authentication and transaction failures needed to be resolved alongside duplicate prevention, error handling, and reprocessing.

Our role

Owned requirements, architecture, implementation, and cross-system troubleshooting. Reconciled data-model and processing differences, resolved authentication and transaction failures, and built duplicate-prevention, error-handling, notification, and reprocessing controls.

Documented outcome

Completed implementation in 134 hours against a 150-hour not-to-exceed authorization. Two formal end-to-end scenarios successfully created enterprise orders, followed by a seven-order regression suite. Delivered the tested integration, requested refinements, and corrected technical documentation through implementation closeout.

Results reflect completed implementation and transaction validation.

Explore with the AI guide

Data & decision support

Technology operations intelligence

An evidence-based operating baseline to focus deeper diagnostics and improvement work.

More than 30,000 records turned into a focused operating baseline.

Source coverage and interpretation limits documented. Proposed actions are not presented as achieved savings.

From operating records to priorities

ReliabilityRecurring issues and site patterns
ResponseRegional differences and closure behavior
DependenciesVulnerability and vendor constraints
KnowledgeProblem management and documentation

Candidate 90-day actions mapped to effort and dependencies.

Explore the engagement

01 / 04

Business risk

Technology leadership needed a defensible basis for prioritizing recurring operational issues.

Critical finding

Data coverage and closure patterns needed to be tested before headline averages could support improvement decisions.

Our role

Analyzed more than 30,000 service-management tickets with more than 2,000 change records and supporting problem and knowledge data. Examined recurrence, response patterns, vulnerability-remediation timing, vendor dependencies, and documentation coverage. Tested data coverage and closure patterns rather than relying on headline averages.

Documented outcome

Produced a management-ready operating baseline and candidate 90-day actions mapped to effort and dependencies. Surfaced more than 4,000 recurring tickets across 20 months and four areas for further validation: site reliability, regional response differences, vulnerability/vendor dependencies, and problem/knowledge capture. Provided a defensible basis for prioritizing deeper diagnostics and improvement work.

The delivered result is analysis and a prioritization basis for further work.

Explore with the AI guide

Visuals are illustrative; they do not depict client sites or systems.

Client perspectives

What clients value in the work.

Complex integration

“An integration has to work for the business, not just connect two systems. They understand that, get into the details, work through difficult dependencies, and stay accountable for the result.”

Industrial manufacturing client

Operational reliability

“What stands out is their understanding of what operations depend on. They make the risks clear and challenge assumptions, so we can move forward with confidence in our decisions.”

Mining client

Technical partnership

“Technically deep, direct in communication, and constructive with our team. That is what we value in a partner on complex work, along with clear ownership of the decisions that matter.”

Cloud services provider

Connect with TMG

Bring your next technology challenge.

Discuss the business objective, the current constraints, and where you need experienced technical ownership.

Book a 30-minute introduction Send an inquiry